🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion” – is a big but guardian-like friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “biggest cuddle bug” with a gentle spirit.

Thirty captive beluga whales in a Canada-based entertainment facility have been entangled in a tussle between a defunct facility, local and national governments and advocacy groups.

But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their fate often ignores the complexities of the whales who, after growing up in enclosed habitats, have been closely studied by the caretakers who interact with them daily.

After the Canadian government blocked the export of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to end their lives unless the authorities funds the upkeep of keeping them alive. The nation’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.

Intelligent Marine Mammals

Experts say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their vocal imitation skills, cognitive challenges and social skills point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something a former trainer observed directly.

She spent three years as a marine mammal specialist, a position that entailed building relationships of the aquatic animals.

“Building up those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of love. At the start, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was nonetheless astounded by the subtleties and idiosyncrasies in their characters. She cultivated a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with different natures.

“Eve selected me. Cleo required effort,” she said. “Both altered the way I perceive relationships.”

Growing Opposition and Facility Decline

Her relationship with the whales developed against a context of increasing societal concern to their captivity.

During her three years at the attraction, multiple belugas and the park’s single killer whale, the orca, died. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a toll which the park links to natural mortality, but which advocates say points to the poor conditions in which they were kept.

The facility did not operate to the guests over the summer, but Burgess says she witnessed firsthand effects of the shutdown. “Structural materials is deteriorating from the enclosures because they’re in disrepair and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not comment to a questionnaire, but previously claimed: “The whales … receive far superior health care and around the clock supervision than any person in the Britain, or other places.”

Fate in Limbo and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the facility in recent months following the demise of a beluga, an ailing beluga the park staff had to put down. She said the facility suspected particulars of the death were disclosed to the media and she was let go shortly thereafter.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s ultimatum to end the lives of its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “significant manpower”, trucks and specialized tools.

“There’s no way in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for calls for the whales to be transferred right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In recent months, the nation’s government official rejected a proposal to transfer the whales to an overseas location.

“To approve the proposal would have meant a perpetual life in enclosure and a reversion to performance for audiences,” the minister commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals should be in the ocean, not in tanks for our amusement. I could not in ethical standing approve an transfer that would prolong the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s comments indicate a broader misunderstanding of the facts of existence for belugas raised in confinement.

“The society needs to grasp these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need constant supervision for the foreseeable future,” she said. “Many just don’t realize that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘end operations’.”

Alternative Habitat and Continuing Discussion

As decision makers struggle to find a solution, ideas have surfaced, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be freed into the wilds of northern regions – where whales are a key source of nourishment for Inuit communities.

A suggested sanctuary in the region of eastern Canada, which has received government approval, has proven most controversial. The prospective site, which includes extensive space of enclosed sea water, is not yet built. Supporters remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for some of the whales.

But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “only an untested concept” in the whales’ fate.

Different voices say the possibility of a protected habitat indicates a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable plan in the short term.

The project lead, head of the initiative, said the facility will mimic the cognitive activities and nutrition the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a much larger space. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|